Wedinator 
 

« Previous | Next »

I See London…


Funny Wedding Photos - I See London

Submitted by: dunno source via Submit Page

…I see France, I see somebody’s boring, lifeless, unsexy, maybe satin, possibly laundry day underpants! 

For realz, this is why women should consider a nice see-through/lace combo for their Special Day. Cuz shit like this happens when you’re on a horse, getting out of a car, walking down a flight of stairs or riding a see-saw

Incorrect source or offensive?

Add this to your blog:
(Copy & paste code)

» See all 17 comments

  1. Wren says:

    Just be glad she’s wearing underpants at all.

  2. 5kidswdisabilities says:

    At least her underwear matches!!!

    Lindsey Petersen
    http://5kidswdisabilities.wordpress.com

  3. rachel says:

    Honestly, those lace/silk underpants cost upwards of $20/pair. If I’m going to straddle a horse on my wedding day, I’ll wear the cheap underpants and change out later. I would hate to ruin a good pair on some over-sized animal and its saddle.

  4. Liz says:

    sidesaddle exists for a reason….

    • J says:

      That’s exactly what I was thinking. Tip for any brides considering this: sidesaddle is classy but only if you DON’T FALL OFF. Even if you’re an accomplished equestrian, take a lesson ahead of time!

  5. I read this picture that she’s giving birth to the horse. Anyone else?

    Guys?

    Guys?

  6. beth says:

    Geez, judgmental much? God forbid someone wear sensible underwear on the day of their wedding, especially when they’re going to be sitting on a horse. I agree with rachel, it would be ill-advised to wear expensive lacy underwear knowing that you’re going to be sitting on a horse.

    Even if she weren’t sitting on a horse, I think those look perfectly wedding appropriate to me; they’re clean (or were before she sat on a horse) and white. Why does a women need to spend extra money buying a pair of expensive lacy underwear for her “special day,” weddings already cost enough with out having to worry about your underwear. Who cares if they’re simple?

    • phoenix says:

      I’m with you. Frankly, I never buy into the “criticize a woman for wearing comfortable panties” school. What a gal wears around her nethers is about as personal as it gets. But i guess if you’re getting married you’re supposed to be seducing the entire world.

  7. som says:

    What, just because they’re white, they’re granny? That could be a thong for all you know. They could be silk. She clearly groomed, what more could a person want? Why would you wear brightly coloured underpants under a white dress anyway?

  8. Staticcling says:

    Umm…she’s backwards.

  9. HoraceRider says:

    I detect a trace of Camel Toe

  10. Patsy says:

    She’s holding her dress up to modestly cover the fact that she’s breast-feeding her infant. [Sarah Palin's advice]

  11. cha cha says:

    Dude, she is clean shaven and raring to go. in other words, those fall into her “fancy” category. Awesome.

  12. Hatter says:

    This looks like one of those “traps” you see on other websites… that’s not a camel toe.

  13. [...] More Miscellaneous Oops! Moments Incorrect source or offensive?Tags:accident, couple salute, Grandpa, instruments, Nazi, [...]

  14. [...] One Stomp For ‘I Do’, Two Stomps For ‘I Don’t’ and I See London… Incorrect source or offensive?Tags:accident, bridal shower, bridle shower, horse lady, SJP, [...]


Your comment

 

 

Search

Bliss Feed


EmailSubscribe
Enter your email address:
 

TwitterFollow us
on Twitter »
FacebookBecome a
Facebook fan »
RSSRSS Feed »
  • Bliss Cloud

  • Recent Objections

    huh? on Viral Wedding Ring: “Mod…
    Grouchy Ole Broad on Pirates Vs. Ninjas Vs. Br…
    ladyofargonne on Viral Wedding Ring: “Mod…
    Chris on Viral Wedding Ring: “Mod…
    Joel on Viral Video: Man Forced To Mar…
  • Even Moar Lolz